The Claims Committee requires that the court be competent for the purpose of each of the new claims and that the consolidation of rights is never mandatory. A party who files a complaint for breach of contract may file a complaint of assault at a later date, if he wishes. However, if the claims relate to the same facts, the doctrine of legal force does not allow the applicant to make claims later, for example.B. when a plaintiff files a complaint of assault and the case is closed, he cannot subsequently bring a battery action in connection with the same event. The Joinder of the parties also finds itself in two categories: permissive Joinder and Compulsory Joinder. The Federal Regulation of Civil Procedure No. 20 is addressed to the Permissive Joiner. The authorized Joinder allows multiple applicants to participate in legal action if each of their claims is the result of the same transaction or transaction and where there is a common question of law or fact that relates to the claims of all applicants. For example, many landowners may join together to sue a plant for environmental release on their property. Permissive Joinder is also fit to join several defendants, as long as the same considerations are met for membership of several complainants. This often happens in defective product disputes; the applicant will sue the manufacturer of the finished product and the component manufacturers. The court must have personal jurisdiction over each accused involved in the prosecution. [2] The parties acknowledge and accept that, in any dispute between them that complies with this Joinder Agreement or which is in any way related to the Joinder Agreement, any person waives the right to have any defence built, on the basis of the performance of this Agreement, on the other hand or on the provision of such electronically executed counter-parts.

Legally, a Joinder is the combination of two or more legal issues. From a procedural point of view, a Joinder allows for multiple issues to be heard at a hearing or trial and is implemented when the issues or parties involved overlap sufficiently to make the process more efficient or equitable. It helps courts not to hear the same facts repeatedly or to see the same parties appear separately in court for each of their disputes. This term is also used in the area of treaties to describe the accession of new parties to an existing agreement. Membership in civil law falls into two categories: Joining claims and joining the party. Mandatory membership is governed by the Federal Civil Procedure Regulation 19, which requires the membership of certain parties. The parties that need to be brought together are those that are necessary and indispensable to litigation. The rule includes several reasons why this might be the case, even if that party has an interest in the litigation that it cannot protect if it has not joined. For example, if three parties each claim land and the first two pursue each other, the third party may not be able to protect the (alleged) interest in the property if it has not joined. Another circumstance is that a party may end up with inconsistent obligations, for example.B.

it may be invited by two different courts to grant exclusive rights to the same property to two different parties. This is avoided by joining the parties in legal action. However, while the “necessary” parties must join if this Joinder is possible, the dispute will continue without them if membership is impossible, for example if the court is not competent for the party. On the other hand, if “indispensable” parties cannot be members, the dispute cannot be pursued. Courts have some discretion in determining which parts are essential, although the federal code contains certain guidelines. [3] Joinder of Claims refers to the perception of several rights against the same party. Under U.S. federal law, the joiner of claims is subject to Rule 18 of the federal civil procedure. These rules allow applicants to consolidate all claims they have against a