If you have any questions, re. Consensus or decision-making by boards of directors, send us an email. We are happy to hear from our readers and engage with you. With the incremental process and practical procedures for collaborative decision-making, your team experiences the creativity and adaptability that emerges within a consent system. They also learn to distinguish when consent is used (for governance at special circle meetings) and when a one-time person or leader is able to make decisions independently. Click here to learn more. When we have made a decision by mutual agreement, we cannot assume that each member of the group actually prefers the option that has become the group`s decision. Haug, Christoph (2015): What is consensus and how is it achieved at meetings? Four consensual decision-making practices. In: Joseph A.

Allen, Nale Lehmann-Willenbrock – Steven G. Rogelberg (Eds.): The Cambridge Handbook OF Meeting Science. New York: Cambridge Univ. Press. 556-584. DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781107589735.024 While everyone on Wikipedia has a right to be heard, this does not mean that discussions remain open indefinitely until we hear about them. Nor does it mean that a consensus should be overturned by a call to the “Wikipedians there”, who do not agree. It is not possible to determine whether this is the case or not. Therefore, if you think that the current discussion is not really an opinion, you should prove it either by referring to an existing discussion or by suggesting that you start a new discussion with a wider audience. Third, use the phrase “disagree and commit.” This sentence will save a lot of time. If you have some direction, although there is no consensus, it is helpful to say, “See, I know we do not agree on this issue, but are you going to play with me? Disagreement and confession?¬†Until then, no one can know the answer safely, and you will probably get a quick yes. The consensus decision-making process often has several roles to make the process more efficient.

Although the name and nature of these roles differ from group to group, the most frequent moderators are moderators, conensors, timekeepers, a sensitive and a secretary or note taker. Not all decision-making bodies use all of these roles, although the position of mediator is almost always occupied and some groups use additional roles, such as. B for example a defender of the devil or a defender of the devil. Some decision-making bodies rotate these roles through the group members in order to build the experience and abilities of the participants and to prevent any perceived concentration of power. [24] The characteristics of the consensual decision are: general convergence between members of a given group or community, each exercising some discretion in decision-making and follow-up. Urfalino, Philippe (2007): The decision by apparent consensus: Nature and properties. In: European Journal of Social Sciences, Vol. P.

47-70. DOI: 10.4000/ress.86 Approval means that there are no substantial objections to a subject.